Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jane L's avatar

There's some good information here, but it's marred by some sloppy writing or lack of editing.

Some examples:

- "ongoing trial against Ghislaine Maxwell" - there is no current trial.

- "In her memoir (not written until 2015, when she was 31-years-old)," - The memoir was written earlier according to known information from cout filings. 2011 is usually the year with which the "manuscript" is dated given. (Also, it's "31 years old," not "31-years-old")

- "with Virginia turning 17 just months after her first day working at Trump's famous resort." - Mar-a-Lago employment records had her starting work there in August 2000, and she turned 17 on August 9, 2000. Therefore, she didn't turn 17 months after starting work there. More accurately, it was around a week or less, depending on her exact start date.

- There are boxes showing quotes from Giuffre's 2016 deposition that also include your analysis writing on her resume ("CV").

- Amounts regarding what she was paid by the Mail vary from what is listed in court documents, and amounts are used in pounds when all court filings cite dollar figure.

There are other places clean up is needed in the writing. I point this out becaue I support your aim in pointing out where Giuffre has lied and fabricated tales to make money. However, if you want to be taken seriously in discrediting her, your own work needs to be unquestionable in order to be believable. Right now, the writing quality isn't there to meet your goal.

Val Crosby's avatar

I remember this article from your site. I can count on one hand the journalists doing this work. This level of self-censorship should be criminal!

No posts

Ready for more?